Transparency
The elephant in the data
The advent of AI in the 2020s, specifically generative AI such as large language models, which we implement, was only made possible by training datasets acquired via the scraping and non-consensual use of data and work of real people. People who will likely never be compensated for its use in generating untold billions in profits for the same companies that took it without permission.
We know that our donations do not solve the root of the problem but we believe that it is better to at least try and ameliorate the harm with our contributions. We are actively planning, and considering methods of implementing AI in business that are ethical from the very first training dataset.
Donations
Go Local AI will donate a minimum of 5% of our revenue and a minimum of 10% of our profits, both allocated annually at our discretion, towards organisations that combat the negative effects of generative AI, the data centres required to run AI and the tech industry's general contributions towards climate change, job loss, and exploitation of people in the global south.
The charities, funds and organizations Go Local AI currently plans on donating to for the 2026 financial year are
Good Shepherd International Foundation
for their work combating child labour in cobalt-mining communities through education, healthcare, livelihoods and community support. The hardware behind every AI system, including ours, most green energy initiatives depends on cobalt those communities are exploited to extract.
for their work improving water security, protecting water resources and supporting communities affected by pollution, scarcity and climate change. Data centres can consume significant quantities of water for cooling, and the communities nearest to raw resource extraction sites are often those with the least access to clean water.
for providing fellowships, bursaries, mentorship and career support to emerging artists facing economic and social barriers. Generative AI was trained on the work of artists who were never asked and never paid. We cannot undo that, but we can support the people it affects, by helping fund opportunities to foster human creativity and creation.
for using the law to protect the environment and hold governments and corporations accountable for pollution, environmental damage and greenwashing. Which is crucial working in fighting the impact of the climate crisis and giving incentives for businesses to conduct themselves in a way that puts the planet first.
for investigating corporate abuses in the extractive industries and supporting affected workers and communities in seeking accountability and remediation. A more fair and sustainable supply chain can go a long way towards reducing everyone’s impact from the usage of new technologies.
for providing intensive training, mentoring and employment support to people facing barriers to work, helping them transition into careers in technology, sustainability and healthcare. It is an initiative more important than ever because every new tool like AI has displaced jobs, and created new ones that require specialized training.
Our total contribution and donations towards those organisations will be published in a report at the end of the 2026 financial year.
Compute donated to public research
During periods of renewable energy surplus, we will contribute otherwise idle compute towards public research projects such as Folding@home, GPUGRID, and Einstein@Home.
Our compute hours and other related information will be released in a report at the end of the 2026 financial year
Our stance on offset credits
We are opposed to the use of carbon offsets, water credits, biodiversity credits, mineral credits or any other mechanisms that substitute payment for genuine reduction or direct support. We believe in directly funding support for the people, artists, works, communities, and ecosystems negatively affected by us and the entire industry. We verify that any data centre we host with are actually powered by renewable energy and do not rely on offsets.
Our commitment to not support the defence industry.
Per our drafted Articles of Association and the personal values of our founders we commit to not work with or support any companies who produce products or services designed to harm another person, be used as a tool of war or as a tool to violate basic human rights.
Per our data sovereignty, we can ensure any data that processes through our systems will not end up in the hands of firms or institutions that would violate our commitment to not further harm.
No-migration rate
The no-migration rate is how often our full audits conclude with a verdict of 'stay as you are' or 'not ready yet' for a client. It measures whether we recommend honestly, including when honesty means we do not get further work.
Our no migration rate will be published in a report at the end of the 2026 financial year
Environmental framework
We assess and report environmental impact using a three-tier framework. Because different types of environmental claims carry varying degrees of certainty, to stay fully transparent we refuse to present each tier as equivalent.
Tier 1. What your provider discloses.
We document what your current AI provider publishes about energy use, carbon emissions and water consumption, and what they do not or chose to omit. As of August 2026, only one major provider has published a detailed per-query energy methodology. One other has offered a single figure without supporting data for a model released in 2023. The rest have published nothing.
Where the figures do exist, the variance between a short query and a long one can exceed 100x, so a single "per-query" number tells you very little about what any specific workload actually costs. For any business trying to understand the environmental impact of the AI it already uses, this is an ongoing issue.
Tier 2. Right-sizing.
Not every task needs the most powerful model. A flagship model like GPT-5.6 Sol or Claude Fable 5 can use 20 to 100 times more energy per request than a smaller one like GPT-5.6 Luna or Claude Haiku. Most business AI work, drafting, summarising, classifying, extracting, does not require a flagship model. When every request goes through the most expensive model regardless, the waste is both financial and environmental at the same time. Matching the model to the task is the single largest lever most businesses have for reducing their AI energy use. With locally hosted open-weight models that control goes further, because the model, its configuration, and the hardware it runs on are all known, chosen, and measurable rather than decided for you by a provider who chooses not to disclose that information.
Tier 3. What our impact is.
Because we control the model, the hardware, and the data centre, we can measure what a workload actually costs in energy and carbon rather than estimating it. Energy per task and CO₂ per task, measured on the hardware we run, at the carbon intensity of the facility we host in. This is possible because we know the variables. Most cloud providers cannot give you the same figure because they refuse to publish the data. For clients considering self-hosting, the same calculation applies to their hardware, their power source, and their local grid. Local is not automatically greener than cloud. We commit to honestly reporting everything we measure, and let the numbers decide our stance on the environmental impact.
Hosting and data centre partners
We are currently in the process of verifying our planned hosting partner's environmental claims.
The data centre's published materials state 100% renewable energy for UK data centres and full UK data sovereignty. We have requested verification of the renewable energy claim, specifically whether it rests on direct renewable supply, a power purchase agreement, or REGOs. The claim is reported here as stated by the data centre, it has not been fully verified by us.
We do not repeat a partner facility's renewable or carbon neutral status on our own materials until we have a written answer on what it rests on.
Data sovereignty
Client data processed through Go Local AI stays in the UK. It does not leave the UK unless explicitly agreed in a hybrid routing arrangement, in which case the destination country, provider, retention terms, and training position are named and approved before any data moves.
Client data is never used to train a model for another client. We do not create or train large language models. With full hosting we mechanically cannot supply client data to people who do.
These commitments are contractual. They are stated in the data processing agreement, and the terms are described in the agreement rather than only on this page.
Model licence transparency
Open-weight is not open source. Licence terms vary by release rather than by family, and a client who describes their AI as "open source" on our recommendation may be making a false statement.
For every model we recommend or deploy we verify the exact licence name, version, and restrictions. This is provided in the audit report and the hosting agreement.
What this page is not
This is not a legal document and does not replace the contracts, NDAs, and data processing agreements we sign with clients. It is a public record of what we claim, what we can verify, and what we cannot yet verify.